I really liked Sana McHarek’s teaching and strategies.
Yesterday, I observed her group 1 (level
1 and 2) composition class. She had put an agenda on the board, followed
it very well and referred back to it occasionally. She started with giving some
feedback on drafts, which the group had done the day before. I liked how Sana
took advantage of me being there (I guess), in that she explained the correction symbols
on the board for me (“we don’t correct the mistakes for the students, we only
tell them, or write on their paper what kind of mistake was made, so that they
have to think about it and can learn from their mistakes”) while it seemed as if
she wanted to remind the students of how this was done.
The new project was a comparison / contrast essay. What Sana
wanted the students to do, after she had modeled the exercise in detail while
involving the students a lot, was concentrate on brainstorming / outlining and
drafting in yesterday’s class. “If you write a comparison essay you compare:
two objects, two people, two ideas, etc.” And “when you compare, you look at
similarities or differences.” Most students seemed to understand how to do the
brainstorming exercise in using a graphic organizer, and participated well when
Sana modeled how this was done correctly. And the students used the same
methods when they got the second topic “Compare Tallahassee with Your Hometown”
(the first topic was “Compare Life in the City with Life in the Countryside). She
gave them precise instructions on how long every part should take them,
brainstorming 5 minutes, etc. Level 2 students, I learned, who are obviously
more advanced and ambitious, get additional assignments from her, which I think
is great, so that they do not get bored.
No comments:
Post a Comment