This morning I observed Felicia
Ciapetta's intermediate level grammar class. The first thing I
noticed, before the class had even started, was Ms. Ciapetta's
buoyant attitude and the friendly, familiar way she chatted with her
students. Felicia's students were without exception comfortable and
even excited in her classroom, a mood which seemed totally
inconsistent with my own memories of grammar class.
After setting the tone with some light
music, Felicia began the class with what she called a 'bell ringer,'
a question posed to the students for brief discussion. In this case
the bell ringer was a question of opinion, and one of surprising
complexity: is love a feeling or a choice? Felicia's students seemed
eager to express themselves and animatedly discussed the topic for
about 10 minutes. She even put me on the spot, which forced me to do
some weird and unexpected introspection. Anyway as Felicia explained
the bell ringer was intended to challenge the students to express
their personal feelings on a topic, and in doing so, to apply grammar
in a realistic, productive way.
The day's grammar lesson was on
indefinite vs definite articles. Ms. Ciapetta had the students
complete a brief worksheet with a partner. The students completed the
activity quickly and apparently without error, and so Felicia gave a
short lecture on some common, confusing irregular articles (eg. a
universal vs an universal). Throughout the lesson there was plenty of
interaction between teacher and students.
Felicia's class demonstrated for me the
importance of the student-teacher relationship. By creating a
lighthearted atmosphere, Ms. Ciapetta engages student attention and
facilitates learning.
Matt - excellent observation comments. I really enjoyed reading what you observed. Nice work, Dave
ReplyDelete